AMD A6-3400M
Intel Celeron J1850
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
Select disk 1
Select disk 2

AMD A6-3400M vs Intel Celeron J1850

Overall score
star star star star star
Overall score
star star star star star

It's time to compare processors AMD A6-3400M vs. AMD A6-3400M and find out which model is better, more modern and more productive, for example in games or rendering. We use not only official processor specifications but also benchmark results to achieve maximum accuracy in performance evaluation.

Comparing AMD A6-3400M vs. AMD A6-3400M

First of all, the comparison of AMD A6-3400M vs AMD A6-3400M should start with a basic perception of the performance difference. All of the values listed in the table are important and affect the final position in the ranking of the best processors. Determining the difference is very easy with our comparison:

. . . . . . . . . . .
Specs CPU AMD A6-3400M CPU AMD A6-3400M
Model dateAMD A6-3400M AMD A6-3400M
Frequency per core 1.40 GHz 1.40 GHz
RAM type and frequencyDDR3-1333 DDR3-1333
Motherboard socket FS1 FS1
Number of cores 4 4
Kernel Threads 4 4
Basic clock speed1.40 GHz 1.40 GHz
Lithography32 nm 32 nm
L2 cache memory-- --
L3 cache memory4.00 MB 4.00 MB
Architecture Llano (K10) Llano (K10)
TDP35 W 35 W
heat output 35 W 35 W
Where to useMobile Mobile

What is the main difference between AMD A6-3400M and AMD A6-3400M?

The main difference between AMD A6-3400M / AMD A6-3400M processors is the clock speed, L2 and L3 memory size, production date, and base clock speed which directly affects performance or gaming performance.

Whether AMD A6-3400M or AMD A6-3400M?

To determine the best match between AMD A6-3400M and AMD A6-3400M, it is worth looking at scores in performance benchmarks, otherwise known as benchmarks. The higher the score, the faster and more modern the processor is, it is the one you can buy to upgrade your system.

Reasons to consider
AMD A6-3400M
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron J1850
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.40 GHz
    Around 30% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    10 W left arrow 35 W
    About 0.29 times less performance per watt
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD A6-3400M AMD A6-3400M
Intel Celeron J1850 Intel Celeron J1850
CPU generation and family

Comparison of processors AMD A6-3400M vs. Intel Celeron J1850 will begin with the difference in model generations and their basic specifications: the purpose of the model (for server or workstation, computer or laptop), the code name of the CPU model and its generation, the previous model and the family related to a specific processor group.

  • Name
    AMD A6-3400M left arrow Intel Celeron J1850
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    AMD A left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 6
  • CPU group
    AMD A6-3000M left arrow Intel Celeron J1000/N2000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Comparing processors AMD A6-3400M vs. Intel Celeron J1850 in this info section reveals us the performance difference in terms of base clock frequency, number of cores and number of threads. Note the possibility of overclocking models and support for hyperthreading, which is important for processing large data sets.

  • Frequency
    1.40 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.30 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    2.30 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Integrated graphics in the CPU is an addition that is not always found in models. So just pay attention to the presence of iGPU, it is a feature that does not affect the overall performance evaluation. If the CPU comparison AMD A6-3400M versus Intel Celeron J1850 lacks an integrated graphics card in one of the models being compared, just go ahead and explore the following information.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6520G left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    0.40 GHz left arrow 0.69 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.79 GHz
  • Execution units
    5 left arrow 4
  • Shader
    320 left arrow 32
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 11.2
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q3/2013
Hardware codec support

Consider hardware codec support for CPU AMD A6-3400M and CPU Intel Celeron J1850 in a performance comparison. Hardware acceleration helps to convert processed data into sound or video files; in fact, the presence or absence of this support does not affect the power of the model.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Memory & PCIe

Comparing the performance of processors AMD A6-3400M and Intel Celeron J1850 in terms of supported memory specifications and PCIe can significantly impact the models' overall performance in gaming, rendering, and other professional applications. Make sure to examine these specifications closely; the CPU that supports a more advanced DDR memory standard (currently version 5), the latest PCIe version (version 5 being the newest), and compatibility with higher clock speed RAM will come out on top.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1333 left arrow DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 4

Intel's Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (Intel AES-NI) is a standard implemented by Intel for its processors, aimed at providing a higher level of data protection through encryption. This feature might not be available in some AMD models. It is not included in performance ratings or benchmark speed evaluations.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

When comparing processors AMD A6-3400M and Intel Celeron J1850, it is important to pay attention to the processor's cooling system. A good cooling system ensures stable processor operation, prevents overheating, and increases its performance. The best processors are typically equipped with more efficient cooling systems, which is one of the factors that influence their high performance.

  • TDP (PL1)
    35 W left arrow 10 W
Technical details

Comparison of the technical specifications of the processor AMD A6-3400M and Intel Celeron J1850. Here you need to look at the difference in release date (more modern model will be released later), as well as on the size of the second and third level cache (L3 and L3). Also, choose a processor made according to a more modern technological process (indicated in nanometers, the smaller the value, the better).

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Llano (K10) left arrow Bay Trail
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    FS1 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q3/2013
Devices using this processor

At the end of the processor model comparison AMD A6-3400M and Intel Celeron J1850 you can see in which workstations, gaming computers or laptops the models were installed. If you find an inaccuracy, please email us and we will complete this page.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons