AMD Epyc 7551P
Intel Xeon Gold 6126
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
Select disk 1
Select disk 2

AMD Epyc 7551P vs Intel Xeon Gold 6126

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2017
Released
Q3/2017
Overall score
star star star star star

It's time to compare processors AMD Epyc 7551P vs. Intel Xeon Gold 6126 and find out which model is better, more modern and more productive, for example in games or rendering. We use not only official processor specifications but also benchmark results to achieve maximum accuracy in performance evaluation.

Comparing AMD Epyc 7551P vs. Intel Xeon Gold 6126

First of all, the comparison of AMD Epyc 7551P vs Intel Xeon Gold 6126 should start with a basic perception of the performance difference. All of the values listed in the table are important and affect the final position in the ranking of the best processors. Determining the difference is very easy with our comparison:

. . . . . . . . . . .
Specs CPU AMD Epyc 7551P CPU Intel Xeon Gold 6126
Model dateAMD Epyc 7551P Intel Xeon Gold 6126
Frequency per core 2.00 GHz 2.60 GHz
RAM type and frequencyDDR4-2666 DDR4-2666
Motherboard socket SP3 LGA 3647
Number of cores 32 12
Kernel Threads 64 24
Basic clock speed2.00 GHz 2.60 GHz
Lithography14 nm 14 nm
L2 cache memory-- --
L3 cache memory64.00 MB 19.00 MB
Architecture Naples (Zen) Skylake
TDP180 W 125 W
heat output 180 W 125 W
Where to useDesktop / Server Desktop / Server
 

What is the main difference between AMD Epyc 7551P and Intel Xeon Gold 6126?

The main difference between AMD Epyc 7551P / Intel Xeon Gold 6126 processors is the clock speed, L2 and L3 memory size, production date, and base clock speed which directly affects performance or gaming performance.

Whether AMD Epyc 7551P or Intel Xeon Gold 6126?

To determine the best match between AMD Epyc 7551P and Intel Xeon Gold 6126, it is worth looking at scores in performance benchmarks, otherwise known as benchmarks. The higher the score, the faster and more modern the processor is, it is the one you can buy to upgrade your system.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD Epyc 7551P
Report a bug
  • More number of cores
    32 left arrow 12
    2 times more threads
Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon Gold 6126
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.60 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
    Around 23% better clock speed
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    3.70 GHz left arrow 3.00 GHz
    Around 19 % better overclocked clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    125 W left arrow 180 W
    About 0.69 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD Epyc 7551P AMD Epyc 7551P
Intel Xeon Gold 6126 Intel Xeon Gold 6126
CPU generation and family

Comparison of processors AMD Epyc 7551P vs. Intel Xeon Gold 6126 will begin with the difference in model generations and their basic specifications: the purpose of the model (for server or workstation, computer or laptop), the code name of the CPU model and its generation, the previous model and the family related to a specific processor group.

  • Name
    AMD Epyc 7551P left arrow Intel Xeon Gold 6126
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Epyc left arrow Intel Xeon Gold
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    AMD Epyc 7001 left arrow Intel Xeon Gold 5100/6100
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Comparing processors AMD Epyc 7551P vs. Intel Xeon Gold 6126 in this info section reveals us the performance difference in terms of base clock frequency, number of cores and number of threads. Note the possibility of overclocking models and support for hyperthreading, which is important for processing large data sets.

  • Frequency
    2.00 GHz left arrow 2.60 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    32 left arrow 12
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.00 GHz left arrow 3.70 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    64 left arrow 24
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Integrated graphics in the CPU is an addition that is not always found in models. So just pay attention to the presence of iGPU, it is a feature that does not affect the overall performance evaluation. If the CPU comparison AMD Epyc 7551P versus Intel Xeon Gold 6126 lacks an integrated graphics card in one of the models being compared, just go ahead and explore the following information.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

Consider hardware codec support for CPU AMD Epyc 7551P and CPU Intel Xeon Gold 6126 in a performance comparison. Hardware acceleration helps to convert processed data into sound or video files; in fact, the presence or absence of this support does not affect the power of the model.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

Comparing the performance of processors AMD Epyc 7551P and Intel Xeon Gold 6126 in terms of supported memory specifications and PCIe can significantly impact the models' overall performance in gaming, rendering, and other professional applications. Make sure to examine these specifications closely; the CPU that supports a more advanced DDR memory standard (currently version 5), the latest PCIe version (version 5 being the newest), and compatibility with higher clock speed RAM will come out on top.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2666 left arrow DDR4-2666
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    8 left arrow 6
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    128 left arrow 48
Encryption

Intel's Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (Intel AES-NI) is a standard implemented by Intel for its processors, aimed at providing a higher level of data protection through encryption. This feature might not be available in some AMD models. It is not included in performance ratings or benchmark speed evaluations.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

When comparing processors AMD Epyc 7551P and Intel Xeon Gold 6126, it is important to pay attention to the processor's cooling system. A good cooling system ensures stable processor operation, prevents overheating, and increases its performance. The best processors are typically equipped with more efficient cooling systems, which is one of the factors that influence their high performance.

  • TDP (PL1)
    180 W left arrow 125 W
Technical details

When comparing the technical specifications of processors AMD Epyc 7551P and Intel Xeon Gold 6126, it's important to consider several key factors that can impact their performance and efficiency. Firstly, take note of the release date, as newer models are generally more advanced and have improved performance. Secondly, consider the size of the L2 and L3 cache, as this directly affects the processor's speed of data processing and retrieval. Additionally, it's important to check the manufacturing process technology, as the smaller the nanometer value, the more advanced the technology and the better the performance. All these factors should be taken into account when making a decision on which processor to choose.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L3-Cache
    64.00 MB left arrow 19.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Naples (Zen) left arrow Skylake
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    SP3 left arrow LGA 3647
  • Release date
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q3/2017
Devices using this processor

At the end of the processor model comparison AMD Epyc 7551P and Intel Xeon Gold 6126 you can see in which workstations, gaming computers or laptops the models were installed. If you find an inaccuracy, please email us and we will complete this page.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons