AMD FX-8100
AMD A8-5500
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
Select disk 1
Select disk 2

AMD FX-8100 vs AMD A8-5500

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2011
Released
Q3/2012
Overall score
star star star star star

It's time to compare processors AMD FX-8100 vs. AMD A8-5500 and find out which model is better, more modern and more productive, for example in games or rendering. We use not only official processor specifications but also benchmark results to achieve maximum accuracy in performance evaluation.

Comparing AMD FX-8100 vs. AMD A8-5500

First of all, the comparison of AMD FX-8100 vs AMD A8-5500 should start with a basic perception of the performance difference. All of the values listed in the table are important and affect the final position in the ranking of the best processors. Determining the difference is very easy with our comparison:

. . . . . . . . . . .
Specs CPU AMD FX-8100 CPU AMD A8-5500
Model dateAMD FX-8100 AMD A8-5500
Frequency per core 2.80 GHz 3.20 GHz
RAM type and frequencyDDR3-1866 DDR3-1866
Motherboard socket AM3+ FM2
Number of cores 8 4
Kernel Threads 8 4
Basic clock speed2.80 GHz 3.20 GHz
Lithography32 nm 32 nm
L2 cache memory-- --
L3 cache memory8.00 MB 4.00 MB
Architecture Vishera (Bulldozer) Trinity (Piledriver)
TDP95 W 65 W
heat output 95 W 65 W
Where to useDesktop / Server Desktop / Server
 

What is the main difference between AMD FX-8100 and AMD A8-5500?

The main difference between AMD FX-8100 / AMD A8-5500 processors is the clock speed, L2 and L3 memory size, production date, and base clock speed which directly affects performance or gaming performance.

Whether AMD FX-8100 or AMD A8-5500?

To determine the best match between AMD FX-8100 and AMD A8-5500, it is worth looking at scores in performance benchmarks, otherwise known as benchmarks. The higher the score, the faster and more modern the processor is, it is the one you can buy to upgrade your system.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8100
Report a bug
  • More number of cores
    8 left arrow 4
    2 times more threads
Reasons to consider
AMD A8-5500
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
    Around 13% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    65 W left arrow 95 W
    About 0.68 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD FX-8100 AMD FX-8100
AMD A8-5500 AMD A8-5500
CPU generation and family

Comparison of processors AMD FX-8100 vs. AMD A8-5500 will begin with the difference in model generations and their basic specifications: the purpose of the model (for server or workstation, computer or laptop), the code name of the CPU model and its generation, the previous model and the family related to a specific processor group.

  • Name
    AMD FX-8100 left arrow AMD A8-5500
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD FX left arrow AMD A
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    AMD FX-8000 left arrow AMD A8-5000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Comparing processors AMD FX-8100 vs. AMD A8-5500 in this info section reveals us the performance difference in terms of base clock frequency, number of cores and number of threads. Note the possibility of overclocking models and support for hyperthreading, which is important for processing large data sets.

  • Frequency
    2.80 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.70 GHz left arrow 3.70 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Integrated graphics in the CPU is an addition that is not always found in models. So just pay attention to the presence of iGPU, it is a feature that does not affect the overall performance evaluation. If the CPU comparison AMD FX-8100 versus AMD A8-5500 lacks an integrated graphics card in one of the models being compared, just go ahead and explore the following information.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon HD 7560D
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.76 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    left arrow 4
  • Shader
    left arrow 256
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 2
  • Generation
    left arrow 4
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 11
  • Technology
    left arrow 32 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q3/2012
Hardware codec support

Consider hardware codec support for CPU AMD FX-8100 and CPU AMD A8-5500 in a performance comparison. Hardware acceleration helps to convert processed data into sound or video files; in fact, the presence or absence of this support does not affect the power of the model.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

Comparing the performance of processors AMD FX-8100 and AMD A8-5500 in terms of supported memory specifications and PCIe can significantly impact the models' overall performance in gaming, rendering, and other professional applications. Make sure to examine these specifications closely; the CPU that supports a more advanced DDR memory standard (currently version 5), the latest PCIe version (version 5 being the newest), and compatibility with higher clock speed RAM will come out on top.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption

Intel's Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (Intel AES-NI) is a standard implemented by Intel for its processors, aimed at providing a higher level of data protection through encryption. This feature might not be available in some AMD models. It is not included in performance ratings or benchmark speed evaluations.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

When comparing processors AMD FX-8100 and AMD A8-5500, it is important to pay attention to the processor's cooling system. A good cooling system ensures stable processor operation, prevents overheating, and increases its performance. The best processors are typically equipped with more efficient cooling systems, which is one of the factors that influence their high performance.

  • TDP (PL1)
    95 W left arrow 65 W
Technical details

When comparing the technical specifications of processors AMD FX-8100 and AMD A8-5500, it's important to consider several key factors that can impact their performance and efficiency. Firstly, take note of the release date, as newer models are generally more advanced and have improved performance. Secondly, consider the size of the L2 and L3 cache, as this directly affects the processor's speed of data processing and retrieval. Additionally, it's important to check the manufacturing process technology, as the smaller the nanometer value, the more advanced the technology and the better the performance. All these factors should be taken into account when making a decision on which processor to choose.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    8.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Vishera (Bulldozer) left arrow Trinity (Piledriver)
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    AM3+ left arrow FM2
  • Release date
    Q4/2011 left arrow Q3/2012
Devices using this processor

At the end of the processor model comparison AMD FX-8100 and AMD A8-5500 you can see in which workstations, gaming computers or laptops the models were installed. If you find an inaccuracy, please email us and we will complete this page.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons