AMD FX-9830P vs Intel Core i3-7102E

Comparison of processors AMD FX-9830P vs. Intel Core i3-7102E will begin with the difference in model generations and their basic specifications: the purpose of the model (for server or workstation, computer or laptop), the code name of the CPU model and its generation, the previous model and the family related to a specific processor group.

• Name
  AMD FX-9830P Intel Core i3-7102E
• Family
  AMD FX Intel Core i3
• CPU group
  AMD FX-9800 Intel Core i 7000U
• Segment
  Mobile Mobile
• Generation
  4 7

Comparing processors AMD FX-9830P vs. Intel Core i3-7102E in this info section reveals us the performance difference in terms of base clock frequency, number of cores and number of threads. Note the possibility of overclocking models and support for hyperthreading, which is important for processing large data sets.

• Core architecture
  normal normal
• Overclocking
  No No
• Frequency
  3.00 GHz 2.10 GHz

Integrated graphics in the CPU is an addition that is not always found in models. So just pay attention to the presence of iGPU, it is a feature that does not affect the overall performance evaluation. If the CPU comparison AMD FX-9830P versus Intel Core i3-7102E lacks an integrated graphics card in one of the models being compared, just go ahead and explore the following information.

• GPU name
  AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge) Intel HD Graphics 630
• GPU frequency
  0.90 GHz 0.35 GHz
• GPU (Turbo)
  No turbo 0.95 GHz
• Execution units
  8 24
• Shader
  512 192
• Max. GPU Memory
  2 GB 64 GB
• Max. displays
  2 3
• Generation
  6 9.5
• Technology
  28 nm 14 nm
• Release date
  Q2/2016 Q2/2016

Consider hardware codec support for CPU AMD FX-9830P and CPU Intel Core i3-7102E in a performance comparison. Hardware acceleration helps to convert processed data into sound or video files; in fact, the presence or absence of this support does not affect the power of the model.

• h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
  No Decode / Encode
• h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
  No Decode / Encode
• h264
  Decode Decode / Encode
• VP8
  No Decode / Encode
• VP9
  No Decode / Encode
• AV1
  No No
• AVC
  Decode Decode / Encode
• VC-1
  Decode Decode
• JPEG
  Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

The performance comparison between processors AMD FX-9830P and Intel Core i3-7102E in terms of supported memory specification and PCIe affects the overall performance of the models in games, rendering and other working applications. Please pay attention to these specifications, the CPU that supports the more modern DDR memory standard (version 5 current), has the latest PCIE version (version 5 the latest), and is compatible with higher clock speed RAM will win.

• Memory type
  DDR4-2400 DDR4-2400
• Max. Memory
  64 GB 64 GB
• Memory channels
  2 (Dual Channel) 2
• ECC
  No Yes

This is important information that will tell you how much power you need for the new CPU you choose based on a comparison between AMD FX-9830P and Intel Core i3-7102E. The higher the TDP, the hotter the chip gets, hence the need for an improved cooling system (usually more expensive). Hot processors are more difficult to cool and require motherboards with quality capacitors.

• TDP (PL1)
  35 W 25 W
• TDP up
  45 W --
• TDP down
  25 W --
• Tjunction max.
  90 \xc2\xb0C 100 °C

Comparison of the technical specifications of the processor AMD FX-9830P and Intel Core i3-7102E. Here you need to look at the difference in release date (more modern model will be released later), as well as on the size of the second and third level cache (L3 and L3). Also, choose a processor made according to a more modern technological process (indicated in nanometers, the smaller the value, the better).

• Technology
  28 nm 14 nm
• Socket
  FP4 BGA 1440
• L2-Cache
  2.00 MB --
• L3-Cache
  -- 3.00 MB
• Architecture
  Excavator (Bristol Ridge) Kaby Lake U
• Virtualization
  AMD-V VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
• Instruction set (ISA)
  x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
• ISA extensions
  SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
• Release date
  Q2/2016 Q1/2017