Intel Core i3-3220
AMD A4-3400
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
Select disk 1
Select disk 2

Intel Core i3-3220 vs AMD A4-3400

Overall score
star star star star star
Overall score
star star star star star

It's time to compare processors Intel Core i3-3220 vs. AMD A4-3400 and find out which model is better, more modern and more productive, for example in games or rendering. We use not only official processor specifications but also benchmark results to achieve maximum accuracy in performance evaluation.

Comparing Intel Core i3-3220 vs. AMD A4-3400

First of all, the comparison of Intel Core i3-3220 vs AMD A4-3400 should start with a basic perception of the performance difference. All of the values listed in the table are important and affect the final position in the ranking of the best processors. Determining the difference is very easy with our comparison:

. . . . . . . . . . .
Specs CPU Intel Core i3-3220 CPU AMD A4-3400
Model dateIntel Core i3-3220 AMD A4-3400
Frequency per core 3.30 GHz 2.70 GHz
RAM type and frequencyDDR3-1600 DDR3-1600
Motherboard socket LGA 1155 FM1
Number of cores 2 2
Kernel Threads 4 2
Basic clock speed3.30 GHz 2.70 GHz
Lithography22 nm 32 nm
L2 cache memory-- --
L3 cache memory3.00 MB 1.00 MB
Architecture Ivy Bridge S Llano (K10)
TDP55 W 65 W
heat output 55 W 65 W
Where to useDesktop / Server Desktop / Server

What is the main difference between Intel Core i3-3220 and AMD A4-3400?

The main difference between Intel Core i3-3220 / AMD A4-3400 processors is the clock speed, L2 and L3 memory size, production date, and base clock speed which directly affects performance or gaming performance.

Whether Intel Core i3-3220 or AMD A4-3400?

To determine the best match between Intel Core i3-3220 and AMD A4-3400, it is worth looking at scores in performance benchmarks, otherwise known as benchmarks. The higher the score, the faster and more modern the processor is, it is the one you can buy to upgrade your system.

Reasons to consider
Intel Core i3-3220
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.30 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
    Around -22% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    55 W left arrow 65 W
    About 1.18 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
AMD A4-3400
Report a bug
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Core i3-3220 Intel Core i3-3220
AMD A4-3400 AMD A4-3400
CPU generation and family

Comparison of processors Intel Core i3-3220 vs. AMD A4-3400 will begin with the difference in model generations and their basic specifications: the purpose of the model (for server or workstation, computer or laptop), the code name of the CPU model and its generation, the previous model and the family related to a specific processor group.

  • Name
    Intel Core i3-3220 left arrow AMD A4-3400
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Core i3 left arrow AMD A
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    Intel Core i 3000 left arrow AMD A4-3000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Comparing processors Intel Core i3-3220 vs. AMD A4-3400 in this info section reveals us the performance difference in terms of base clock frequency, number of cores and number of threads. Note the possibility of overclocking models and support for hyperthreading, which is important for processing large data sets.

  • Frequency
    3.30 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Integrated graphics in the CPU is an addition that is not always found in models. So just pay attention to the presence of iGPU, it is a feature that does not affect the overall performance evaluation. If the CPU comparison Intel Core i3-3220 versus AMD A4-3400 lacks an integrated graphics card in one of the models being compared, just go ahead and explore the following information.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics 2500 left arrow AMD Radeon HD 6410D
  • GPU frequency
    0.65 GHz left arrow 0.60 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    1.05 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow 2
  • Shader
    48 left arrow 160
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 1 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 3
  • DirectX Version
    11.0 left arrow 11
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2012 left arrow Q4/2010
Hardware codec support

Consider hardware codec support for CPU Intel Core i3-3220 and CPU AMD A4-3400 in a performance comparison. Hardware acceleration helps to convert processed data into sound or video files; in fact, the presence or absence of this support does not affect the power of the model.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

Comparing the performance of processors Intel Core i3-3220 and AMD A4-3400 in terms of supported memory specifications and PCIe can significantly impact the models' overall performance in gaming, rendering, and other professional applications. Make sure to examine these specifications closely; the CPU that supports a more advanced DDR memory standard (currently version 5), the latest PCIe version (version 5 being the newest), and compatibility with higher clock speed RAM will come out on top.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1600 left arrow DDR3-1600
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2

Intel's Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (Intel AES-NI) is a standard implemented by Intel for its processors, aimed at providing a higher level of data protection through encryption. This feature might not be available in some AMD models. It is not included in performance ratings or benchmark speed evaluations.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

When comparing processors Intel Core i3-3220 and AMD A4-3400, it is important to pay attention to the processor's cooling system. A good cooling system ensures stable processor operation, prevents overheating, and increases its performance. The best processors are typically equipped with more efficient cooling systems, which is one of the factors that influence their high performance.

  • TDP (PL1)
    55 W left arrow 65 W
Technical details

When comparing the technical specifications of processors Intel Core i3-3220 and AMD A4-3400, it's important to consider several key factors that can impact their performance and efficiency. Firstly, take note of the release date, as newer models are generally more advanced and have improved performance. Secondly, consider the size of the L2 and L3 cache, as this directly affects the processor's speed of data processing and retrieval. Additionally, it's important to check the manufacturing process technology, as the smaller the nanometer value, the more advanced the technology and the better the performance. All these factors should be taken into account when making a decision on which processor to choose.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE3, SSE4a
  • L3-Cache
    3.00 MB left arrow 1.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Ivy Bridge S left arrow Llano (K10)
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 1155 left arrow FM1
  • Release date
    Q3/2012 left arrow Q3/2011
Devices using this processor

At the end of the processor model comparison Intel Core i3-3220 and AMD A4-3400 you can see in which workstations, gaming computers or laptops the models were installed. If you find an inaccuracy, please email us and we will complete this page.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons