Intel Pentium 3825U
AMD E2-3200
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
Select disk 1
Select disk 2

Intel Pentium 3825U vs AMD E2-3200

Overall score
star star star star star
Overall score
star star star star star

It's time to compare processors Intel Pentium 3825U vs. AMD E2-3200 and find out which model is better, more modern and more productive, for example in games or rendering. We use not only official processor specifications but also benchmark results to achieve maximum accuracy in performance evaluation.

Comparing Intel Pentium 3825U vs. AMD E2-3200

First of all, the comparison of Intel Pentium 3825U vs AMD E2-3200 should start with a basic perception of the performance difference. All of the values listed in the table are important and affect the final position in the ranking of the best processors. Determining the difference is very easy with our comparison:

. . . . . . . . . . .
Specs CPU Intel Pentium 3825U CPU AMD E2-3200
Model dateIntel Pentium 3825U AMD E2-3200
Frequency per core 1.90 GHz 2.40 GHz
RAM type and frequencyDDR3-1600 DDR3-1600
Motherboard socket BGA 1168 FM1
Number of cores 2 2
Kernel Threads 4 2
Basic clock speed1.90 GHz 2.40 GHz
Lithography22 nm 28 nm
L2 cache memory-- --
L3 cache memory2.00 MB 1.00 MB
Architecture Haswell U Llano (K10)
TDP15 W 65 W
heat output 15 W 65 W
Where to useMobile Mobile

What is the main difference between Intel Pentium 3825U and AMD E2-3200?

The main difference between Intel Pentium 3825U / AMD E2-3200 processors is the clock speed, L2 and L3 memory size, production date, and base clock speed which directly affects performance or gaming performance.

Whether Intel Pentium 3825U or AMD E2-3200?

To determine the best match between Intel Pentium 3825U and AMD E2-3200, it is worth looking at scores in performance benchmarks, otherwise known as benchmarks. The higher the score, the faster and more modern the processor is, it is the one you can buy to upgrade your system.

Reasons to consider
Intel Pentium 3825U
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    15 W left arrow 65 W
    About 4.33 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
AMD E2-3200
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.40 GHz left arrow 1.90 GHz
    Around 21% better clock speed
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Pentium 3825U Intel Pentium 3825U
AMD E2-3200 AMD E2-3200
CPU generation and family

Comparison of processors Intel Pentium 3825U vs. AMD E2-3200 will begin with the difference in model generations and their basic specifications: the purpose of the model (for server or workstation, computer or laptop), the code name of the CPU model and its generation, the previous model and the family related to a specific processor group.

  • Name
    Intel Pentium 3825U left arrow AMD E2-3200
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Pentium left arrow AMD E
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    Intel Pentium 3000 left arrow AMD E2-3000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Comparing processors Intel Pentium 3825U vs. AMD E2-3200 in this info section reveals us the performance difference in terms of base clock frequency, number of cores and number of threads. Note the possibility of overclocking models and support for hyperthreading, which is important for processing large data sets.

  • Frequency
    1.90 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Integrated graphics in the CPU is an addition that is not always found in models. So just pay attention to the presence of iGPU, it is a feature that does not affect the overall performance evaluation. If the CPU comparison Intel Pentium 3825U versus AMD E2-3200 lacks an integrated graphics card in one of the models being compared, just go ahead and explore the following information.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1) left arrow AMD Radeon HD 6379D
  • GPU frequency
    0.30 GHz left arrow 0.44 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.85 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow 2
  • Shader
    96 left arrow 160
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 1 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    8 left arrow 3
  • DirectX Version
    11.2 left arrow 11
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 40 nm
  • Release date
    Q1/2015 left arrow Q4/2010
Hardware codec support

Consider hardware codec support for CPU Intel Pentium 3825U and CPU AMD E2-3200 in a performance comparison. Hardware acceleration helps to convert processed data into sound or video files; in fact, the presence or absence of this support does not affect the power of the model.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

Comparing the performance of processors Intel Pentium 3825U and AMD E2-3200 in terms of supported memory specifications and PCIe can significantly impact the models' overall performance in gaming, rendering, and other professional applications. Make sure to examine these specifications closely; the CPU that supports a more advanced DDR memory standard (currently version 5), the latest PCIe version (version 5 being the newest), and compatibility with higher clock speed RAM will come out on top.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1600 left arrow DDR3-1600
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 1
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow
  • PCIe lanes
    12 left arrow

Intel's Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (Intel AES-NI) is a standard implemented by Intel for its processors, aimed at providing a higher level of data protection through encryption. This feature might not be available in some AMD models. It is not included in performance ratings or benchmark speed evaluations.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

When comparing processors Intel Pentium 3825U and AMD E2-3200, it is important to pay attention to the processor's cooling system. A good cooling system ensures stable processor operation, prevents overheating, and increases its performance. The best processors are typically equipped with more efficient cooling systems, which is one of the factors that influence their high performance.

  • TDP (PL1)
    15 W left arrow 65 W
Technical details

When comparing the technical specifications of processors Intel Pentium 3825U and AMD E2-3200, it's important to consider several key factors that can impact their performance and efficiency. Firstly, take note of the release date, as newer models are generally more advanced and have improved performance. Secondly, consider the size of the L2 and L3 cache, as this directly affects the processor's speed of data processing and retrieval. Additionally, it's important to check the manufacturing process technology, as the smaller the nanometer value, the more advanced the technology and the better the performance. All these factors should be taken into account when making a decision on which processor to choose.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE3, SSE4a
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 1.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Haswell U left arrow Llano (K10)
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1168 left arrow FM1
  • Release date
    Q1/2015 left arrow Q3/2011
Devices using this processor

At the end of the processor model comparison Intel Pentium 3825U and AMD E2-3200 you can see in which workstations, gaming computers or laptops the models were installed. If you find an inaccuracy, please email us and we will complete this page.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons