Select CPU-1
Select CPU-2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
480GB Flash Drive
Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80

480GB Flash Drive vs Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80

Overall score
star star star star star
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparing 480GB Flash Drive vs. Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80 in terms of memory type used, PassMark performance score, and write and read speed. What to look for when comparing Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80 vs 480GB Flash Drive

  1. release date, the earlier the disk is produced, the more modern its hardware is, so 480GB Flash Drive was produced 2020-05-28 and Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80 went on sale 2020-05-28
  2. The price is a volatile indicator, and always varies depending on the region of purchase.
  3. disk memory size makes sense to compare across models with the same size set, so there will be a slight difference in actual free gigabytes.
  4. memory type 480GB Flash Drive - SSD, while 480GB Flash Drive has SSD.
  5. The performance score (based on read and write speed) for 480GB Flash Drive and 480GB Flash Drive drives is 460 MBytes/Sec and 3,041 MBytes/Sec, respectively.
  6. read speed is an important element to check the disk in comparison, the higher the read speed, the better.
  7. write speed is also an important parameter to consider when choosing a new disk.

Reasons to consider
480GB Flash Drive
Report a bug
  • Disk size
    447.1 GB left arrow 1.9 TB
    Around -23432% better size
Reasons to consider
Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests 480GB Flash Drive vs Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80
Complete list of technical specifications
480GB Flash Drive 480GB Flash Drive
Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80 Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80
General info

Compare drives 480GB Flash Drive vs. Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80 to the technical specifications set by the factory. The larger the actual memory size - the better, the higher the benchmark performance score - the faster the read and write data.

  • Drive Size
    447.1 GB left arrow 1.9 TB
  • Other names
    480GB SATA Flash Drive left arrow Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80
  • Drive First Benchmarked
    2020-05-28 left arrow 2020-09-04
  • Drive Rating/$Price
    NA left arrow NA
  • Overall Rank
    3614 left arrow 712
  • Last Price Change
    NA left arrow NA
Disk Test Suite Average Results

It is time to find out what Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80 is better than Asgard AN2 2TNVMe-M.2/80 and what the main differences are in the following specifications: read speed, write speed, processing speed IOPS 4KQD1, as well as random performance evaluation IOPS 32KQD20. After analyzing the data when comparing drives, it is worth choosing the one with the higher specs - all affecting data processing, due to the speed of system applications or games.

  • Sequential Read
    460 MBytes/Sec left arrow 3,041 MBytes/Sec
  • Sequential Write
    398 MBytes/Sec left arrow 2,024 MBytes/Sec
  • Random Seek Read Write (IOPS 32KQD20)
    287 MBytes/Sec left arrow 864 MBytes/Sec
  • IOPS 4KQD1
    25 MBytes/Sec left arrow 82 MBytes/Sec
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons