Select CPU-1
Select CPU-2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2


Overall score
star star star star star
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparing CASPER 240GB vs. KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G in terms of memory type used, PassMark performance score, and write and read speed. What to look for when comparing KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G vs CASPER 240GB

  1. release date, the earlier the disk is produced, the more modern its hardware is, so CASPER 240GB was produced 2019-07-02 and KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G went on sale 2019-07-02
  2. The price is a volatile indicator, and always varies depending on the region of purchase.
  3. disk memory size makes sense to compare across models with the same size set, so there will be a slight difference in actual free gigabytes.
  4. memory type CASPER 240GB - SSD, while CASPER 240GB has SSD.
  5. The performance score (based on read and write speed) for CASPER 240GB and CASPER 240GB drives is and 3,136 MBytes/Sec, respectively.
  6. read speed is an important element to check the disk in comparison, the higher the read speed, the better.
  7. write speed is also an important parameter to consider when choosing a new disk.
In this comparison, we will take a closer look at two popular drives, CASPER 240GB and KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G. These drives can come in various formats, such as HDD, SSD, or NVMe. Find out which one is the best choice for your needs. CASPER 240GB: Name: CASPER 240GB Release Date: 2019-07-02 Memory Size: 223.6 GB Memory Type: SSD Price: NA PassMark Score: 2399 Read Speed: Write Speed: KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G: Name: KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G Release Date: 2020-10-07 Memory Size: 931.5 GB Memory Type: SSD Price: NA PassMark Score: 21929 Read Speed: 3,136 MBytes/Sec Write Speed: 2,026 MBytes/Sec In this side-by-side comparison of CASPER 240GB and KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G, we will examine their key features, including memory size, memory type, read and write speeds, as well as their prices and PassMark scores. This will provide you with a clear understanding of their differences, enabling you to make an informed decision on whichdrive is the better option for your specific needs. Both CASPER 240GB and KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G offer impressive performance and reliability, but they differ in some aspects. For instance, while CASPER 240GB has a memory size of 223.6 GB and a PassMark score of 2399, KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G comes with a memory size of 931.5 GB and a PassMark score of 21929. This means that one drive may have an edge over the other in terms of capacity or overall performance. In terms of read and write speeds, CASPER 240GB boasts a read speed of and a write speed of , whereas KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G has a read speed of 3,136 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 2,026 MBytes/Sec. Depending on your requirements, such as data transfer or processing speed, one of these drives may be more suitable for you. Lastly, when it comes to price, CASPER 240GB is available at NA, while KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G can be purchased for NA. Depending on your budget, you might find one drive more appealing than the other. In conclusion, this in-depth comparison between CASPER 240GB and KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G highlights their key differences and helps you determine which drive is the best fit for your needs. By considering factors such as memory size, memory type, read/write speeds, PassMark scores, and prices, you can make an educated decision and invest in the right storage solution for you.

Reasons to consider
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Report a bug
  • Disk size
    931.5 GB left arrow 223.6 GB
    Around 76 % better size
Performance tests
Real tests CASPER 240GB vs KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G
Complete list of technical specifications
General info

Compare drives CASPER 240GB vs. KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G to the technical specifications set by the factory. The larger the actual memory size - the better, the higher the benchmark performance score - the faster the read and write data.

  • Drive Size
    223.6 GB left arrow 931.5 GB
  • Other names
    CASPER 240GB left arrow KINGSTON SKC2500M81000G
  • Drive First Benchmarked
    2019-07-02 left arrow 2020-10-07
  • Drive Rating/$Price
    NA left arrow NA
  • Overall Rank
    7180 left arrow 652
  • Last Price Change
    NA left arrow NA
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons