Select CPU-1
Select CPU-2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB
SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB

KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB vs SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
2022-04-08
Released
2014-10-28
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparing KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB vs. SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB in terms of memory type used, PassMark performance score, and write and read speed. What to look for when comparing SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB vs KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB

  1. release date, the earlier the disk is produced, the more modern its hardware is, so KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB was produced 2022-04-08 and SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB went on sale 2022-04-08
  2. The price is a volatile indicator, and always varies depending on the region of purchase.
  3. disk memory size makes sense to compare across models with the same size set, so there will be a slight difference in actual free gigabytes.
  4. memory type KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB - SSD, while KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB has SSD.
  5. The performance score (based on read and write speed) for KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB and KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB drives is 2,248 MBytes/Sec and 478 MBytes/Sec, respectively.
  6. read speed is an important element to check the disk in comparison, the higher the read speed, the better.
  7. write speed is also an important parameter to consider when choosing a new disk.
In this comparison, we will take a closer look at two popular drives, KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB and SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB. These drives can come in various formats, such as HDD, SSD, or NVMe. Find out which one is the best choice for your needs. KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB: Name: KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB Release Date: 2022-04-08 Memory Size: 476.9 GB Memory Type: SSD Price: NA PassMark Score: 20323 Read Speed: 2,248 MBytes/Sec Write Speed: 1,831 MBytes/Sec SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB: Name: SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB Release Date: 2014-10-28 Memory Size: 476.9 GB Memory Type: SSD Price: 16.64 PassMark Score: 4076 Read Speed: 478 MBytes/Sec Write Speed: 369 MBytes/Sec In this side-by-side comparison of KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB and SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB, we will examine their key features, including memory size, memory type, read and write speeds, as well as their prices and PassMark scores. This will provide you with a clear understanding of their differences, enabling you to make an informed decision on whichdrive is the better option for your specific needs. Both KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB and SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB offer impressive performance and reliability, but they differ in some aspects. For instance, while KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB has a memory size of 476.9 GB and a PassMark score of 20323, SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB comes with a memory size of 476.9 GB and a PassMark score of 4076. This means that one drive may have an edge over the other in terms of capacity or overall performance. In terms of read and write speeds, KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB boasts a read speed of 2,248 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 1,831 MBytes/Sec, whereas SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB has a read speed of 478 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 369 MBytes/Sec. Depending on your requirements, such as data transfer or processing speed, one of these drives may be more suitable for you. Lastly, when it comes to price, KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB is available at NA, while SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB can be purchased for 16.64. Depending on your budget, you might find one drive more appealing than the other. In conclusion, this in-depth comparison between KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB and SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB highlights their key differences and helps you determine which drive is the best fit for your needs. By considering factors such as memory size, memory type, read/write speeds, PassMark scores, and prices, you can make an educated decision and invest in the right storage solution for you.

Differences
Reasons to consider
KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB vs SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB
SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB
General info

Compare drives KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB vs. SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB to the technical specifications set by the factory. The larger the actual memory size - the better, the higher the benchmark performance score - the faster the read and write data.

  • Drive Size
    476.9 GB left arrow 476.9 GB
  • Other names
    KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB left arrow SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 SCSI Disk Device, SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB, SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB ATA Device
  • Drive First Benchmarked
    2022-04-08 left arrow 2014-10-28
  • Drive Rating/$Price
    NA left arrow 16.64
  • Overall Rank
    808 left arrow 3757
  • Last Price Change
    NA left arrow $245 USD (2016-04-01)
Disk Test Suite Average Results

Unveil the Superior Choice: Comparing KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB and SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB It's time to determine which of these two powerhouse options, SAMSUNG SSD SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB and KBG50ZNS512G NVMe KIOXIA 512GB, comes out on top. We'll compare their key specifications, including read speed, write speed, IOPS 4KQD1 processing speed, and IOPS 32KQD20 random performance. By analyzing and comparing these critical aspects, you'll be able to make an informed decision and choose the drive with superior specs to optimize your system applications or gaming experience.

  • Sequential Read
    2,248 MBytes/Sec left arrow 478 MBytes/Sec
  • Sequential Write
    1,831 MBytes/Sec left arrow 369 MBytes/Sec
  • Random Seek Read Write (IOPS 32KQD20)
    1,576 MBytes/Sec left arrow 276 MBytes/Sec
  • IOPS 4KQD1
    63 MBytes/Sec left arrow 26 MBytes/Sec
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons