Comparing NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 vs. NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G in terms of memory type used, PassMark performance score, and write and read speed.
What to look for when comparing NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G vs NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013
- release date, the earlier the disk is produced, the more modern its hardware is, so NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 was produced 2022-01-16 and NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G went on sale 2022-01-16
- The price is a volatile indicator, and always varies depending on the region of purchase.
- disk memory size makes sense to compare across models with the same size set, so there will be a slight difference in actual free gigabytes.
- memory type NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 - SSD, while NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 has SSD.
- The performance score (based on read and write speed) for NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 and NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 drives is 3,207 MBytes/Sec and 4,106 MBytes/Sec, respectively.
- read speed is an important element to check the disk in comparison, the higher the read speed, the better.
- write speed is also an important parameter to consider when choosing a new disk.
In this comparison, we will take a closer look at two popular drives, NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 and NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G. These drives can come in various formats, such as HDD, SSD, or NVMe. Find out which one is the best choice for your needs.
NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013:
Name: NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013
Release Date: 2022-01-16
Memory Size: 1.8 TB
Memory Type: SSD
Price: NA
PassMark Score: 35495
Read Speed: 3,207 MBytes/Sec
Write Speed: 3,468 MBytes/Sec
NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G:
Name: NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G
Release Date: 2022-02-20
Memory Size: 931.5 GB
Memory Type: SSD
Price: NA
PassMark Score: 42632
Read Speed: 4,106 MBytes/Sec
Write Speed: 3,821 MBytes/Sec
In this side-by-side comparison of NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 and NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G, we will examine their key features, including memory size, memory type, read and write speeds, as well as their prices and PassMark scores. This will provide you with a clear understanding of their differences, enabling you to make an informed decision on whichdrive is the better option for your specific needs.
Both NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 and NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G offer impressive performance and reliability, but they differ in some aspects. For instance, while NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 has a memory size of 1.8 TB and a PassMark score of 35495, NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G comes with a memory size of 931.5 GB and a PassMark score of 42632. This means that one drive may have an edge over the other in terms of capacity or overall performance.
In terms of read and write speeds, NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 boasts a read speed of 3,207 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 3,468 MBytes/Sec, whereas NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G has a read speed of 4,106 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 3,821 MBytes/Sec. Depending on your requirements, such as data transfer or processing speed, one of these drives may be more suitable for you.
Lastly, when it comes to price, NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 is available at NA, while NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G can be purchased for NA. Depending on your budget, you might find one drive more appealing than the other.
In conclusion, this in-depth comparison between NVMe Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 and NVMe KINGSTON SFYRS1000G highlights their key differences and helps you determine which drive is the best fit for your needs. By considering factors such as memory size, memory type, read/write speeds, PassMark scores, and prices, you can make an educated decision and invest in the right storage solution for you.
Germany 
Portuguese 
Italian 
French 
Japan 
Spanish 
Polish 
Chinese 
Russian 
1.8 TB
931.5 GB
