Comparing Sabrent Rocket nano vs. NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000 in terms of memory type used, PassMark performance score, and write and read speed.
What to look for when comparing NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000 vs Sabrent Rocket nano
- release date, the earlier the disk is produced, the more modern its hardware is, so Sabrent Rocket nano was produced 2020-01-24 and NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000 went on sale 2020-01-24
- The price is a volatile indicator, and always varies depending on the region of purchase.
- disk memory size makes sense to compare across models with the same size set, so there will be a slight difference in actual free gigabytes.
- memory type Sabrent Rocket nano - SSD, while Sabrent Rocket nano has SSD.
- The performance score (based on read and write speed) for Sabrent Rocket nano and Sabrent Rocket nano drives is 1,307 MBytes/Sec and 4,642 MBytes/Sec, respectively.
- read speed is an important element to check the disk in comparison, the higher the read speed, the better.
- write speed is also an important parameter to consider when choosing a new disk.
In this comparison, we will take a closer look at two popular drives, Sabrent Rocket nano and NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000. These drives can come in various formats, such as HDD, SSD, or NVMe. Find out which one is the best choice for your needs.
Sabrent Rocket nano:
Name: Sabrent Rocket nano
Release Date: 2020-01-24
Memory Size: 476.9 GB
Memory Type: SSD
Price: NA
PassMark Score: 10441
Read Speed: 1,307 MBytes/Sec
Write Speed: 723 MBytes/Sec
NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000:
Name: NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000
Release Date: 2022-07-16
Memory Size: 953.9 GB
Memory Type: SSD
Price: NA
PassMark Score: 51218
Read Speed: 4,642 MBytes/Sec
Write Speed: 5,141 MBytes/Sec
In this side-by-side comparison of Sabrent Rocket nano and NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000, we will examine their key features, including memory size, memory type, read and write speeds, as well as their prices and PassMark scores. This will provide you with a clear understanding of their differences, enabling you to make an informed decision on whichdrive is the better option for your specific needs.
Both Sabrent Rocket nano and NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000 offer impressive performance and reliability, but they differ in some aspects. For instance, while Sabrent Rocket nano has a memory size of 476.9 GB and a PassMark score of 10441, NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000 comes with a memory size of 953.9 GB and a PassMark score of 51218. This means that one drive may have an edge over the other in terms of capacity or overall performance.
In terms of read and write speeds, Sabrent Rocket nano boasts a read speed of 1,307 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 723 MBytes/Sec, whereas NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000 has a read speed of 4,642 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 5,141 MBytes/Sec. Depending on your requirements, such as data transfer or processing speed, one of these drives may be more suitable for you.
Lastly, when it comes to price, Sabrent Rocket nano is available at NA, while NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000 can be purchased for NA. Depending on your budget, you might find one drive more appealing than the other.
In conclusion, this in-depth comparison between Sabrent Rocket nano and NVMe KINGSTON SKC3000 highlights their key differences and helps you determine which drive is the best fit for your needs. By considering factors such as memory size, memory type, read/write speeds, PassMark scores, and prices, you can make an educated decision and invest in the right storage solution for you.
Germany 
Portuguese 
Italian 
French 
Japan 
Spanish 
Polish 
Chinese 
Russian 
476.9 GB
953.9 GB
