Select CPU-1
Select CPU-2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001
TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe

Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 vs TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
2020-01-24
Released
2018-12-21
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparing Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 vs. TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe in terms of memory type used, PassMark performance score, and write and read speed. What to look for when comparing TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe vs Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001

  1. release date, the earlier the disk is produced, the more modern its hardware is, so Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 was produced 2020-01-24 and TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe went on sale 2020-01-24
  2. The price is a volatile indicator, and always varies depending on the region of purchase.
  3. disk memory size makes sense to compare across models with the same size set, so there will be a slight difference in actual free gigabytes.
  4. memory type Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 - SSD, while Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 has SSD.
  5. The performance score (based on read and write speed) for Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 and Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 drives is 2,545 MBytes/Sec and 2,580 MBytes/Sec, respectively.
  6. read speed is an important element to check the disk in comparison, the higher the read speed, the better.
  7. write speed is also an important parameter to consider when choosing a new disk.
In this comparison, we will take a closer look at two popular drives, Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 and TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe. These drives can come in various formats, such as HDD, SSD, or NVMe. Find out which one is the best choice for your needs. Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001: Name: Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 Release Date: 2020-01-24 Memory Size: 931.5 GB Memory Type: SSD Price: 136.11 PassMark Score: 24094 Read Speed: 2,545 MBytes/Sec Write Speed: 2,250 MBytes/Sec TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe: Name: TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe Release Date: 2018-12-21 Memory Size: 476.9 GB Memory Type: SSD Price: 157.81 PassMark Score: 18148 Read Speed: 2,580 MBytes/Sec Write Speed: 1,574 MBytes/Sec In this side-by-side comparison of Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 and TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe, we will examine their key features, including memory size, memory type, read and write speeds, as well as their prices and PassMark scores. This will provide you with a clear understanding of their differences, enabling you to make an informed decision on whichdrive is the better option for your specific needs. Both Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 and TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe offer impressive performance and reliability, but they differ in some aspects. For instance, while Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 has a memory size of 931.5 GB and a PassMark score of 24094, TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe comes with a memory size of 476.9 GB and a PassMark score of 18148. This means that one drive may have an edge over the other in terms of capacity or overall performance. In terms of read and write speeds, Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 boasts a read speed of 2,545 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 2,250 MBytes/Sec, whereas TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe has a read speed of 2,580 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 1,574 MBytes/Sec. Depending on your requirements, such as data transfer or processing speed, one of these drives may be more suitable for you. Lastly, when it comes to price, Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 is available at 136.11, while TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe can be purchased for 157.81. Depending on your budget, you might find one drive more appealing than the other. In conclusion, this in-depth comparison between Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 and TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe highlights their key differences and helps you determine which drive is the best fit for your needs. By considering factors such as memory size, memory type, read/write speeds, PassMark scores, and prices, you can make an educated decision and invest in the right storage solution for you.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001
Report a bug
  • Disk size
    931.5 GB left arrow 476.9 GB
    Around -95% better size
Reasons to consider
TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 vs TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001
TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe
General info

Compare drives Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 vs. TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe to the technical specifications set by the factory. The larger the actual memory size - the better, the higher the benchmark performance score - the faster the read and write data.

  • Drive Size
    931.5 GB left arrow 476.9 GB
  • Other names
    Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 left arrow KXG60ZNV512G NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB
  • Drive First Benchmarked
    2020-01-24 left arrow 2018-12-21
  • Drive Rating/$Price
    136.11 left arrow 157.81
  • Overall Rank
    477 left arrow 1045
  • Last Price Change
    $177.02 USD (2022-12-10) left arrow $115 USD (2021-10-03)
Disk Test Suite Average Results

Unveil the Superior Choice: Comparing Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 and TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe It's time to determine which of these two powerhouse options, TOSHIBA XG6 SSD 512GB M.2 NVMe and Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001, comes out on top. We'll compare their key specifications, including read speed, write speed, IOPS 4KQD1 processing speed, and IOPS 32KQD20 random performance. By analyzing and comparing these critical aspects, you'll be able to make an informed decision and choose the drive with superior specs to optimize your system applications or gaming experience.

  • Sequential Read
    2,545 MBytes/Sec left arrow 2,580 MBytes/Sec
  • Sequential Write
    2,250 MBytes/Sec left arrow 1,574 MBytes/Sec
  • Random Seek Read Write (IOPS 32KQD20)
    1,922 MBytes/Sec left arrow 908 MBytes/Sec
  • IOPS 4KQD1
    63 MBytes/Sec left arrow 43 MBytes/Sec
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons