Select CPU-1
Select CPU-2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N
KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB

SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N vs KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
2021-05-02
Released
2019-12-11
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparing SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N vs. KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB in terms of memory type used, PassMark performance score, and write and read speed. What to look for when comparing KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB vs SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N

  1. release date, the earlier the disk is produced, the more modern its hardware is, so SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N was produced 2021-05-02 and KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB went on sale 2021-05-02
  2. The price is a volatile indicator, and always varies depending on the region of purchase.
  3. disk memory size makes sense to compare across models with the same size set, so there will be a slight difference in actual free gigabytes.
  4. memory type SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N - SSD, while SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N has SSD.
  5. The performance score (based on read and write speed) for SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N and SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N drives is 2,052 MBytes/Sec and 2,224 MBytes/Sec, respectively.
  6. read speed is an important element to check the disk in comparison, the higher the read speed, the better.
  7. write speed is also an important parameter to consider when choosing a new disk.
In this comparison, we will take a closer look at two popular drives, SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N and KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB. These drives can come in various formats, such as HDD, SSD, or NVMe. Find out which one is the best choice for your needs. SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N: Name: SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N Release Date: 2021-05-02 Memory Size: 476.9 GB Memory Type: HDD Price: NA PassMark Score: 21436 Read Speed: 2,052 MBytes/Sec Write Speed: 1,840 MBytes/Sec KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB: Name: KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB Release Date: 2019-12-11 Memory Size: 953.9 GB Memory Type: SSD Price: NA PassMark Score: 18788 Read Speed: 2,224 MBytes/Sec Write Speed: 1,584 MBytes/Sec In this side-by-side comparison of SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N and KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB, we will examine their key features, including memory size, memory type, read and write speeds, as well as their prices and PassMark scores. This will provide you with a clear understanding of their differences, enabling you to make an informed decision on whichdrive is the better option for your specific needs. Both SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N and KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB offer impressive performance and reliability, but they differ in some aspects. For instance, while SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N has a memory size of 476.9 GB and a PassMark score of 21436, KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB comes with a memory size of 953.9 GB and a PassMark score of 18788. This means that one drive may have an edge over the other in terms of capacity or overall performance. In terms of read and write speeds, SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N boasts a read speed of 2,052 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 1,840 MBytes/Sec, whereas KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB has a read speed of 2,224 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 1,584 MBytes/Sec. Depending on your requirements, such as data transfer or processing speed, one of these drives may be more suitable for you. Lastly, when it comes to price, SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N is available at NA, while KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB can be purchased for NA. Depending on your budget, you might find one drive more appealing than the other. In conclusion, this in-depth comparison between SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N and KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB highlights their key differences and helps you determine which drive is the best fit for your needs. By considering factors such as memory size, memory type, read/write speeds, PassMark scores, and prices, you can make an educated decision and invest in the right storage solution for you.

Differences
Reasons to consider
SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB
Report a bug
  • Disk size
    953.9 GB left arrow 476.9 GB
    Around 50 % better size
Performance tests
Real tests SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N vs KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N
KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB
General info

Compare drives SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N vs. KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB to the technical specifications set by the factory. The larger the actual memory size - the better, the higher the benchmark performance score - the faster the read and write data.

  • Drive Size
    476.9 GB left arrow 953.9 GB
  • Other names
    SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N left arrow KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB
  • Drive First Benchmarked
    2021-05-02 left arrow 2019-12-11
  • Drive Rating/$Price
    NA left arrow NA
  • Overall Rank
    703 left arrow 970
  • Last Price Change
    NA left arrow NA
Disk Test Suite Average Results

Unveil the Superior Choice: Comparing SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N and KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB It's time to determine which of these two powerhouse options, KBG40ZNS1T02 NVMe KIOXIA 1024GB and SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N, comes out on top. We'll compare their key specifications, including read speed, write speed, IOPS 4KQD1 processing speed, and IOPS 32KQD20 random performance. By analyzing and comparing these critical aspects, you'll be able to make an informed decision and choose the drive with superior specs to optimize your system applications or gaming experience.

  • Sequential Read
    2,052 MBytes/Sec left arrow 2,224 MBytes/Sec
  • Sequential Write
    1,840 MBytes/Sec left arrow 1,584 MBytes/Sec
  • Random Seek Read Write (IOPS 32KQD20)
    2,064 MBytes/Sec left arrow 1,464 MBytes/Sec
  • IOPS 4KQD1
    76 MBytes/Sec left arrow 74 MBytes/Sec
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons