Select CPU-1
Select CPU-2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2


Overall score
star star star star star
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparing WDC WD2500JD vs. WDC WD3200BJKT in terms of memory type used, PassMark performance score, and write and read speed. What to look for when comparing WDC WD3200BJKT vs WDC WD2500JD

  1. release date, the earlier the disk is produced, the more modern its hardware is, so WDC WD2500JD was produced 2009-03-15 and WDC WD3200BJKT went on sale 2009-03-15
  2. The price is a volatile indicator, and always varies depending on the region of purchase.
  3. disk memory size makes sense to compare across models with the same size set, so there will be a slight difference in actual free gigabytes.
  4. memory type WDC WD2500JD - HDD, while WDC WD2500JD has HDD.
  5. The performance score (based on read and write speed) for WDC WD2500JD and WDC WD2500JD drives is and , respectively.
  6. read speed is an important element to check the disk in comparison, the higher the read speed, the better.
  7. write speed is also an important parameter to consider when choosing a new disk.
In this comparison, we will take a closer look at two popular drives, WDC WD2500JD and WDC WD3200BJKT. These drives can come in various formats, such as HDD, SSD, or NVMe. Find out which one is the best choice for your needs. WDC WD2500JD: Name: WDC WD2500JD Release Date: 2009-03-15 Memory Size: 232.9 GB Memory Type: HDD Price: 1.92 PassMark Score: 353 Read Speed: Write Speed: WDC WD3200BJKT: Name: WDC WD3200BJKT Release Date: 2009-03-09 Memory Size: 298.1 GB Memory Type: HDD Price: 6.06 PassMark Score: 485 Read Speed: Write Speed: In this side-by-side comparison of WDC WD2500JD and WDC WD3200BJKT, we will examine their key features, including memory size, memory type, read and write speeds, as well as their prices and PassMark scores. This will provide you with a clear understanding of their differences, enabling you to make an informed decision on whichdrive is the better option for your specific needs. Both WDC WD2500JD and WDC WD3200BJKT offer impressive performance and reliability, but they differ in some aspects. For instance, while WDC WD2500JD has a memory size of 232.9 GB and a PassMark score of 353, WDC WD3200BJKT comes with a memory size of 298.1 GB and a PassMark score of 485. This means that one drive may have an edge over the other in terms of capacity or overall performance. In terms of read and write speeds, WDC WD2500JD boasts a read speed of and a write speed of , whereas WDC WD3200BJKT has a read speed of and a write speed of . Depending on your requirements, such as data transfer or processing speed, one of these drives may be more suitable for you. Lastly, when it comes to price, WDC WD2500JD is available at 1.92, while WDC WD3200BJKT can be purchased for 6.06. Depending on your budget, you might find one drive more appealing than the other. In conclusion, this in-depth comparison between WDC WD2500JD and WDC WD3200BJKT highlights their key differences and helps you determine which drive is the best fit for your needs. By considering factors such as memory size, memory type, read/write speeds, PassMark scores, and prices, you can make an educated decision and invest in the right storage solution for you.

Reasons to consider
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Report a bug
  • Disk size
    298.1 GB left arrow 232.9 GB
    Around 22 % better size
Performance tests
Real tests WDC WD2500JD vs WDC WD3200BJKT
Complete list of technical specifications
General info

Compare drives WDC WD2500JD vs. WDC WD3200BJKT to the technical specifications set by the factory. The larger the actual memory size - the better, the higher the benchmark performance score - the faster the read and write data.

  • Drive Size
    232.9 GB left arrow 298.1 GB
  • Drive First Benchmarked
    2009-03-15 left arrow 2009-03-09
  • Drive Rating/$Price
    1.92 left arrow 6.06
  • Overall Rank
    10612 left arrow 9985
  • Last Price Change
    $184 USD (2017-02-21) left arrow $79.99 USD (2016-05-05)
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons