Select CPU-1
Select CPU-2
Select video card 1
Select video card 2
XPG SPECTRIX S20G
Hitachi HTS541064A9E680

XPG SPECTRIX S20G vs Hitachi HTS541064A9E680

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
2021-02-07
Released
2012-12-26
Overall score
star star star star star

Comparing XPG SPECTRIX S20G vs. Hitachi HTS541064A9E680 in terms of memory type used, PassMark performance score, and write and read speed. What to look for when comparing Hitachi HTS541064A9E680 vs XPG SPECTRIX S20G

  1. release date, the earlier the disk is produced, the more modern its hardware is, so XPG SPECTRIX S20G was produced 2021-02-07 and Hitachi HTS541064A9E680 went on sale 2021-02-07
  2. The price is a volatile indicator, and always varies depending on the region of purchase.
  3. disk memory size makes sense to compare across models with the same size set, so there will be a slight difference in actual free gigabytes.
  4. memory type XPG SPECTRIX S20G - HDD, while XPG SPECTRIX S20G has HDD.
  5. The performance score (based on read and write speed) for XPG SPECTRIX S20G and XPG SPECTRIX S20G drives is 360 MBytes/Sec and , respectively.
  6. read speed is an important element to check the disk in comparison, the higher the read speed, the better.
  7. write speed is also an important parameter to consider when choosing a new disk.
In this comparison, we will take a closer look at two popular drives, XPG SPECTRIX S20G and Hitachi HTS541064A9E680. These drives can come in various formats, such as HDD, SSD, or NVMe. Find out which one is the best choice for your needs. XPG SPECTRIX S20G: Name: XPG SPECTRIX S20G Release Date: 2021-02-07 Memory Size: 465.8 GB Memory Type: HDD Price: 186.55 PassMark Score: 17094 Read Speed: 360 MBytes/Sec Write Speed: 294 MBytes/Sec Hitachi HTS541064A9E680: Name: Hitachi HTS541064A9E680 Release Date: 2012-12-26 Memory Size: 596.2 GB Memory Type: HDD Price: NA PassMark Score: 540 Read Speed: Write Speed: In this side-by-side comparison of XPG SPECTRIX S20G and Hitachi HTS541064A9E680, we will examine their key features, including memory size, memory type, read and write speeds, as well as their prices and PassMark scores. This will provide you with a clear understanding of their differences, enabling you to make an informed decision on whichdrive is the better option for your specific needs. Both XPG SPECTRIX S20G and Hitachi HTS541064A9E680 offer impressive performance and reliability, but they differ in some aspects. For instance, while XPG SPECTRIX S20G has a memory size of 465.8 GB and a PassMark score of 17094, Hitachi HTS541064A9E680 comes with a memory size of 596.2 GB and a PassMark score of 540. This means that one drive may have an edge over the other in terms of capacity or overall performance. In terms of read and write speeds, XPG SPECTRIX S20G boasts a read speed of 360 MBytes/Sec and a write speed of 294 MBytes/Sec, whereas Hitachi HTS541064A9E680 has a read speed of and a write speed of . Depending on your requirements, such as data transfer or processing speed, one of these drives may be more suitable for you. Lastly, when it comes to price, XPG SPECTRIX S20G is available at 186.55, while Hitachi HTS541064A9E680 can be purchased for NA. Depending on your budget, you might find one drive more appealing than the other. In conclusion, this in-depth comparison between XPG SPECTRIX S20G and Hitachi HTS541064A9E680 highlights their key differences and helps you determine which drive is the best fit for your needs. By considering factors such as memory size, memory type, read/write speeds, PassMark scores, and prices, you can make an educated decision and invest in the right storage solution for you.

Differences
Reasons to consider
XPG SPECTRIX S20G
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Hitachi HTS541064A9E680
Report a bug
  • Disk size
    596.2 GB left arrow 465.8 GB
    Around 22 % better size
Performance tests
Real tests XPG SPECTRIX S20G vs Hitachi HTS541064A9E680
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
XPG SPECTRIX S20G XPG SPECTRIX S20G
Hitachi HTS541064A9E680 Hitachi HTS541064A9E680
Comments 0
Leave a comment
Latest comparisons